The mission of Recovery International is to use the cognitive-behavioral, peer-to-peer, self-help training system developed by Abraham Low, MD, to help individuals gain skills to lead more peaceful and productive lives.
The organization meets this mission by providing mental health self-help groups Recovery International community, telephone and online meetings, The Power to Change for Schools and The Power to Change for Corrections.
RI is a renown, cognitive-behavioral, peer-to-peer self-help training system. With groups meeting weekly, it is perhaps one of the largest peer-led programs for persons struggling with emotional and mental health problems. Although hundreds of thousands of people have used the RI Method, not much is known about the reasons why individuals initially decide to go to RI meetings, and why some decide to stop attending meetings. Additionally, little research has examined how participation in group meetings helps individuals better manage their everyday problems.
To address this knowledge ga p, the RI Group Meeting Evaluation had two goals:
(1) collect information on RI group participation and satisfaction; and
(2) examine the extent to which RI participation helps individuals cope with daily life challenges. These
combined data are important scientific evidence ALSHS needs to document RI participation benefits to policy makers and program administrators who make decisions about what services to offer to people living with serious emotional problems.
This Executive Summary provides a basic overview of the evaluation. Major findings regarding RI participation, satisfaction and benefits are described in this document. The final report discusses our results in greater detail, and will be available in March 2011.
RECOVERY INTERNATIONAL GROUP MEETING EVALUATION
SUSAN PICKETT, PhD, Principal I nvestigator
DEPARTMENT OF PSYCHIATRY, UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO
Download a full copy of the Final Report at www.lowselfhelpsystems.org
RI is a renowned, cognitive-behavioral, peer-to-peer self-help training system. With groups meeting weekly,
it is perhaps one of the largest peer-led programs for persons struggling with emotional and mental health
Of 126 individuals who enrolled in the evaluation, 79 completed each of the 4 telephone interviews conducted during their year-long study participation. This is a very good interview follow-up rate for national longitudinal studies done by telephone.
On average, participants had coped with mental health symptoms for 24 years
– 94% had seen a professional about a mental health problem
– 82% had been formally diagnosed with a mental illness
– 47% had a primary diagnosis of depression
– 25% had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder
– 15% had a diagnosis of anxiety disorder
– 53% had been hospitalized for a mental health problem
– 30% reported co-occurring physical problems
– Nearly 20% had been treated for a drug or alcohol problem at some point in their lives.
One year after they went to their first RI meeting, evaluation participants reported:
– Decreased severity of mental health symptoms
– Decreased depressive symptoms
– Decreased anxiety symptoms
– Fewer mental health and social service needs
– Less use of mental health and social services
– Increased overall mental health recovery
– Improved confidence in one’s own ability to achieve mental health r ecovery
– Increased willingness to ask others for help and support
– Decreased mental health symptom domination (one’s life is not controlled by symptoms)
– Increased feelings of hope
– Improved self-esteem
-Increased coping mastery ability
– Increased social connectedness/support
“RI Dosage effect”: Greater attendance of RI groups is significantly associated with fewer and less severe
total mental health symptoms, depressive symptoms, and anxiety symptoms. Greater attendance of RI
groups also appears to help participants feel better about themselves, enhancing their self-esteem and coping
Peer to peer CBT: Numerous studies demonstrate the effectiveness of cognitive-behavioral techniques in
improving mental health. Most of these programs, however, are led by professionals. Our evaluation< /o:p>
results suggest that peers can be similar instruments of change. RI’s peer support and connections with
others are vital to people struggling with mental health problems, particularly those who, like these
newcomers, may have few people to turn to for help.
RI participation enhances mental health recovery. We attribute this result to several RI program components:
– The Method and tools-for example, “try, fail, try, fail, try, succeed”-teaches participants that it takes many attempts to successfully change a behavior. By endorsing themselves for simply making an effort, RI participants are encouraged to keep trying, and to not give up.
– Attendees continually and consistently practiced these skills amongst peers tackling similar challenges.
– They had peer group leaders who were real life examples of how to overcome obstacles and achieve
Across all interviews, participants reported that nothing was unhelpful: quite the opposite, they found
everything about the RI program to be helpful to them and gave them important skills that help them better
manage their daily lives.
Participants showed very good knowledge of RI methods and tools. Participants were able to quickly learn this
informati on, and RI knowledge remained stable over time. Higher RI knowledge scores were associated with
greater recovery and personal confidence.
Participants’ internalization of negative public stereotypes of mental illness decreased over time. This
suggests that RI participation appears to be a “stigma buster,” helping to enforce a message that public
negative stereotypes of mental illness do not diminish participants’ self-worth.
To view the entire Study and Executive Summary visit www.lowselfhelpsystems.org
For more information, contact email@example.com